There was a time when action movies were simple. Ah, yes, we're going in the Wayback Nostalgia Machine again so brace yourself. There were movies where the good guys were good guys, and the bad guys were bad guys, despicable without an ounce of anything even remotely redeeming. I like to call this time in Hollywood history.....the 1980s. That's simplifying the premise too much, but my point is valid. We had the Russians/Soviets/Commies to root against. In the vein of those straightforward, black and white action movies come 2013's Olympus Has Fallen.
A longtime Secret Service agent and the head of the Presidential detail, Mike Banning (Gerard Butler) is removed from his post when President Benjamin Asher (Aaron Eckhart)'s wife is killed accidentally in a winter car wreck. Banning leaves the Secret Service and takes a job in Washington D.C. as a U.S. Treasury agent. Some 18 months pass, and Mike still yearns to get back to what he was so good at and loved. He may get his chance. Sneaking into the White House as part of a South Korean diplomacy party, a North Korean paramilitary terrorist, Kang (Rick Yune), leads a well coordinated attack that decimates Washington and takes over the White House, capturing the President and much of his cabinet. As the bodies mount in the lightning-quick strike, Mike is among those fighting back, even managing to get into the White House in all the bloody, bullet-riddled chaos. As the terrorists make their demands and the nation and the world wait to see what happens, Mike works from the inside, using all his know-how and skills to take down the North Koreans.
Does this movie sound even remotely familiar? It should. From director Antoine Fuqua (Training Day, Tears of the Sun), 'Olympus' is a not so subtle tweaking of Die Hard meets Air Force One. Whole scenes from those movies are tweaked, twisted and prodded here and there to make it slightly different. More than just those two movies, it plays like every action movie you've ever seen and will see ever again down the road. So what to say about this one rather than wrap it up here? Ready for a twist? I LOVED this movie. It's so epically stupid I can't even describe, but I loved it. I betcha didn't see that one coming, now did you? Don't be confused. This isn't a good movie with all its mindless action, cardboard characters and goofy one-liners. What is it then? This is a popcorn movie. Sit back with a big tub of popcorn, turn off your brain and just enjoy a movie for a change.
So how to explain why I liked this movie? Action movies aren't just action movies anymore. So often they have to throw a ridiculous twist at you or telegraph a horrifically unsubtle, heavy-handed message at you. 'Olympus' gets back to the basics in a big way. Americans = Good. North Koreans = Bad. The timing is also interesting considering North Korea's recent threats of firing nuclear weapons at the U.S. but that's for someone significantly more cultured and intelligent than me to analyze. I'm more of an explosions and gunfight kind of guy. If familiar, the premise is very cool, an unsettling attack on Washington D.C. setting the tone for the rest of the movie. It's incredibly uncomfortable to watch civilians get shot down in the street, the Washington Monument crumbling, the White House under heavy attack with Secret Service and military forces shot down in droves doing their duty. In a very straightforward movie, there's something primal in these scenes. If it sounds simplistic on my part, so be it. America gets attacked, and Americans fight back. Cue a pissed-off Scotsman in Gerard Butler, and we've got ourselves an action flick.
I like Gerard Butler. I don't always like his selection in movies, but I like him just the same. This is him doing what he should be doing. He handles himself well in drama and comedy, but I think he's best as an action star. Here as the ex-Army Ranger turned Secret Service agent turned Treasury agent, it's ideal casting. His past haunts him, and he wants to make things right. When the White House, the President, and America (cue dramatic music), Butler's Banning steps to the plate. As an action star, he's extremely capable. He's believable in his fight scenes, believable as he sneers and snides his way through countless cheesy one-liners. The dynamic between Banning and Yune's Kang is eerily reminiscent of Bruce Willis and Alan Rickman in Die Hard so as long as you're going to rip a movie off, at least rip off a good one. Moral of the story is this, Gerard Butler is cool and a more than worthy leading man as an action hero.
The casting on the whole is solid. It's also fair to say not much of the talent assembled here is given much to do, but whatever, minor complaint. Eckhart is a solid President, an everyman who wants the best for his country and his son (not shrill but talented Finley Jacobsen). His Cabinet and the government higher-ups include Morgan Freeman as the Speaker of the House, Melissa Leo as the Secretary of Defense, Robert Forster as Army Chief of Staff, Sean O'Bryan as Deputy National Security Advisor and Angela Bassett as the head of the Secret Service. Oh, yeah, also look for Dylan McDermott, Ashley Judd, Radha Mitchell and Cole Hauser in key supporting roles. Lots of people, lots of talent. Underused and/or misused maybe, but it's fun seeing so many big names together.
Enough with all this acting mumbo-jumbo. This is a movie about action and gunfights and stabbings and explosions! Borrowing heavily from Die Hard, Banning works from inside-out at the White House, trying to take down the North Koreans one by one. Oh, and those North Koreans are highly trained commandos so we're in store for some good, old-fashioned hand-to-hand combat. If it's a little cliched, so be it. The bad guys for the most part can't hit anything (Mike), but Mike can hit everything (North Koreans). The North Korean attack on D.C. is something else to watch, a meticulously coordinated attack that's brutal in its efficiency. Without giving away too much, the action is brutal, hard-hitting and even features some solid surprises along the way.
Is this one predictable? Oh, yes. You've probably got a good sense of where this one is heading as of right now....without having seen a second. Wait!!! Morgan Freeman becomes the President?!?! The North Koreans are brilliant in executing a plan but can't capture one freaking man?!? We get lots of shots of American flags blowing in the wind -- to composer Trevor Morris' patriotic score -- and a general feeling of patriotism and national pride. It's a good movie. Don't overthink it or its rather obvious influences. Enjoy it for what it is, a shoot 'em up action flick with a cast that looks to be having a lot of fun.
Olympus Has Fallen (2013): ***/****
The Sons of Katie Elder
"First, we reunite, then find Ma and Pa's killer...then read some reviews."
Showing posts with label Dylan McDermott. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Dylan McDermott. Show all posts
Monday, April 1, 2013
Sunday, July 4, 2010
Runaway Jury
So you check the mail, and that dreaded letter appears, the one you fear finding...JURY SUMMONS!!! Ah, the benefits of a democracy where accused crooks get to be tried by a jury of their peers. Too bad about being on the jury though. You get to meet all sorts of new idiots, get paid very little, and in general, are taken away from your everyday life. That is unless you're on a jury in the movies. There you get to meet Henry Fonda, save the world, and deal with all sorts of intrigue and deception behind the scenes of the courtroom trial, like 2003's Runaway Jury.
That description of course minimalizes the movie and the duty of being a jury member. Based on a novel from courtroom master John Grisham, this 2003 thriller benefits from a very strong, very deep cast that turns in worthy performances from top to bottom. The main idea of the novel/movie is one that should make you chuckle. Someone actually wants to serve on a jury. As for their motivations, I can't give everything away here.
After two years of pretrial, a court case is finally going to trial. A lawyer, husband and father (an uncredited Dylan McDermott) is gunned down in his office along with 10 other employees. The man's wife is suing the guns distributor with a famed prosecutor from New Orleans, Wendell Rohr (Dustin Hoffman), agreeing to take the case. The arms companies understand that if this case is lost, they stand to lose possibly billions of dollars, and hire a specialist to make sure the verdict goes their way. His name is Rankin Finch (Gene Hackman), and he specializes in blackmail and deception to get the right jury candidates on the jury and then use them to his advantage. One juror, Nick Easter (John Cusack), isn't going to go along so easy though. With help from his girlfriend Marlee (Rachel Weisz), Nick plans to blackmail Finch into paying for him to sway the jury. Of course, the offer stands for Rohr too so whoever comes through with the $10 million gets his jury.
As I reviewed several weeks ago with Primal Fear, courtroom dramas translate incredibly well from play, novel, and TV to the big screen. It's a setting that is naturally full of tension and nerves so when you throw a halfway decent script into a mix with a very deep cast, it can be hard to mess that formula up. In a nice twist though, the courtroom drama is secondary here with the behind the scenes situation ending up being far more interesting. Cusack's character starts off as this clueless dolt, and then you realize he's the one duping us all along. But with girlfriend Marlee, are they looking for a huge payout or do they have ulterior motives with their actions?
That's where I was a little disappointed with this Gary Fleder-directed courtroom drama; the ending. Easter and Marlee clearly know what they're doing and more than hold their own in these confrontations with the always-intimidating Gene Hackman. You're honestly not sure of their intentions for much of the movie, but it's apparent they are not just in it for the money. When their true motivations are revealed in the last 10 minutes, everything fits together nicely that can be wrapped up with a nice bow. But there is something missing, and for me, the finale limps to the finish. I won't call it sappy, but it certainly tries to pull at the heart strings. It is not necessarily a bad ending, but not the one I envisioned.
Complain about whatever you'd like from this movie, but the casting is basically off-limits. And with so many names, characters drift in and out, but almost each one is given their chance to shine. The jury includes chameleon-like Cliff Curtis as an ex-Marine, Jennifer Beals, Nora Dunn, an uncredited Luis Guzman, and several other recognizable faces. In the courtroom, Bruce McGill plays Judge Harkin, Bruce Davison plays defense lawyer Durwood Cable (doesn't he just sound bad?), and Jeremy Piven is a jury specialist working with Hoffman, and Stanley Anderson as the face of the guns distributors. As two of the four main leads, Cusack and Weisz work well together, Weisz especially standing out from the crowd with her performance.
What really stuck with me though was the performances from Hoffman and Hackman, two of the biggest stars to come out of the late 1960s and then the 1970s. Before this 2003 drama, the two had never worked together so it's a treat to see them in the same movie. The problem though? Originally they weren't even supposed to have a scene together. Problem solved when a quick rewrite had the two in a confrontation in a courthouse restroom that echoes De Niro and Pacino talking in Heat (the DVD special features discuss this in detail). It's a scene full of great dialogue and a camera that never really stops moving, pushing the frenetic conversation to an even more anxious level. Their performances on the whole stand out from the rest of the movie, but their scene together -- almost 7 minutes long -- is a big reason to watch this movie.
So overall a flawed courtroom drama, but one that is definitely worth looking into. The story is set in New Orleans, and while location shooting doesn't always jive well with typically inside courtroom dramas, Fleder does show off the city when given the chance. Above everything else -- including an ending that didn't blow me away -- the cast is the main reason to watch this one.
Runaway Jury <----trailer (2003): ***/****
That description of course minimalizes the movie and the duty of being a jury member. Based on a novel from courtroom master John Grisham, this 2003 thriller benefits from a very strong, very deep cast that turns in worthy performances from top to bottom. The main idea of the novel/movie is one that should make you chuckle. Someone actually wants to serve on a jury. As for their motivations, I can't give everything away here.
After two years of pretrial, a court case is finally going to trial. A lawyer, husband and father (an uncredited Dylan McDermott) is gunned down in his office along with 10 other employees. The man's wife is suing the guns distributor with a famed prosecutor from New Orleans, Wendell Rohr (Dustin Hoffman), agreeing to take the case. The arms companies understand that if this case is lost, they stand to lose possibly billions of dollars, and hire a specialist to make sure the verdict goes their way. His name is Rankin Finch (Gene Hackman), and he specializes in blackmail and deception to get the right jury candidates on the jury and then use them to his advantage. One juror, Nick Easter (John Cusack), isn't going to go along so easy though. With help from his girlfriend Marlee (Rachel Weisz), Nick plans to blackmail Finch into paying for him to sway the jury. Of course, the offer stands for Rohr too so whoever comes through with the $10 million gets his jury.
As I reviewed several weeks ago with Primal Fear, courtroom dramas translate incredibly well from play, novel, and TV to the big screen. It's a setting that is naturally full of tension and nerves so when you throw a halfway decent script into a mix with a very deep cast, it can be hard to mess that formula up. In a nice twist though, the courtroom drama is secondary here with the behind the scenes situation ending up being far more interesting. Cusack's character starts off as this clueless dolt, and then you realize he's the one duping us all along. But with girlfriend Marlee, are they looking for a huge payout or do they have ulterior motives with their actions?
That's where I was a little disappointed with this Gary Fleder-directed courtroom drama; the ending. Easter and Marlee clearly know what they're doing and more than hold their own in these confrontations with the always-intimidating Gene Hackman. You're honestly not sure of their intentions for much of the movie, but it's apparent they are not just in it for the money. When their true motivations are revealed in the last 10 minutes, everything fits together nicely that can be wrapped up with a nice bow. But there is something missing, and for me, the finale limps to the finish. I won't call it sappy, but it certainly tries to pull at the heart strings. It is not necessarily a bad ending, but not the one I envisioned.
Complain about whatever you'd like from this movie, but the casting is basically off-limits. And with so many names, characters drift in and out, but almost each one is given their chance to shine. The jury includes chameleon-like Cliff Curtis as an ex-Marine, Jennifer Beals, Nora Dunn, an uncredited Luis Guzman, and several other recognizable faces. In the courtroom, Bruce McGill plays Judge Harkin, Bruce Davison plays defense lawyer Durwood Cable (doesn't he just sound bad?), and Jeremy Piven is a jury specialist working with Hoffman, and Stanley Anderson as the face of the guns distributors. As two of the four main leads, Cusack and Weisz work well together, Weisz especially standing out from the crowd with her performance.
What really stuck with me though was the performances from Hoffman and Hackman, two of the biggest stars to come out of the late 1960s and then the 1970s. Before this 2003 drama, the two had never worked together so it's a treat to see them in the same movie. The problem though? Originally they weren't even supposed to have a scene together. Problem solved when a quick rewrite had the two in a confrontation in a courthouse restroom that echoes De Niro and Pacino talking in Heat (the DVD special features discuss this in detail). It's a scene full of great dialogue and a camera that never really stops moving, pushing the frenetic conversation to an even more anxious level. Their performances on the whole stand out from the rest of the movie, but their scene together -- almost 7 minutes long -- is a big reason to watch this movie.
So overall a flawed courtroom drama, but one that is definitely worth looking into. The story is set in New Orleans, and while location shooting doesn't always jive well with typically inside courtroom dramas, Fleder does show off the city when given the chance. Above everything else -- including an ending that didn't blow me away -- the cast is the main reason to watch this one.
Runaway Jury <----trailer (2003): ***/****
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)