Family, can't live with them. Can't live without them. Family dramas can be a dime a dozen but when handled right, they can be home runs drilled out of the ballpark. I didn't necessarily have a ton of interest in catching up with 2013's August: Osage County because it did look a little too familiar, but I'm glad I did. An excellent movie all-around, and as I mentioned periodically while viewing, just a disgusting, talented cast.
It is an especially hot August in the small Oklahoma town of Pawhuska, and the Weston family is in for some fireworks. Family matriarch (of sorts) Violet (Meryl Streep) has been diagnosed with mouth cancer and quickly becoming addicted to the pain pills she's been prescribed. The family has drifted apart over the years, but Violet has to ask them for help, to return to their hometown when their father, Beverly (Sam Shepard), goes missing. There's no trace of where he went to or if he will even be back, but the Westons return in a time of trouble to help their mother (some against their better judgment), including the Weston's oldest daughter, Barbara (Julia Roberts). The family is far from close though, many of them barely able to stand the site of each other. All those buried away emotions and feelings are getting churned up, and they're going to be churned up even more when news of where Beverly went is revealed.
Based on a play of the same name by Tracy Letts, 'August' was a bit of an under the radar flick last winter in terms of Oscar buzz. It made over $70 million in theaters and picked up mostly positive reviews. With this cast, how could it not? Reading reviews, watching previews, I didn't question that it'd be a good movie. I kinda just assumed in that department. But did I want to see it? Need to see it? No, not particularly. I'm glad I did though. It is well worth a couple hours to sit down and watch even if it is equal parts funny and uncomfortable, things changing from one to the other at a moment's notice.
But that's family, isn't it? And that's your movie. These aren't good guys and bad guys. These are people who grew up and reacted/responded differently to their parents, their siblings, their extended families, their house, their school, their surroundings and their environment. That's life, and that is what the movie does so well. That's what life is, and the script by Letts (off the play) does it pretty effortlessly. Much of the movie takes place in the Weston home with an occasional, quick departure here and there. All that frustration and emotion and discomfort has been bottled up for years, and this not so pleasant reunion may be the thing that blows the top right off that stove. Most of that pent-up emotion comes out at a painfully real dinner scene, but more on that later.
But seriously, how about this cast?!? You almost take for granted what a freakishly good actress Meryl Streep is because....well, every year she's in another Oscar-nominated part (she's been nominated 18 times. 18!!!). Streep just commits to each and every part to the point you never even question her. You just go with it. Her Violet is a terrifying character (maybe because my Mom is...ya know, really nice), a mother who had a hellacious childhood and at times takes it out on her kids. She means well -- I think -- but it comes across in some odd ways. The main personal dynamic is between Streep's Violet and Robert's Barbara (both Oscar-nominated turns), a mother and daughter who argue almost constantly, maybe not admitting they're more similar than they would like. Just two supremely talented actresses doing their thing.
But wait. There's more!!! Along with Shepard in a quick appearance early, there's also Violet's sister, Mattie Fae (Margo Martindale), her husband, Charlie (Chris Cooper), and their son, Little Charles (Benedict Cumberbatch), much maligned in the eyes of his mother and often protected by his father. As for the other Weston sisters, there's Ivy (Julianne Nicholson), single and getting a little older who never moved away from her hometown, and Karen (Juliette Lewis), the youngest sister who means well but is a tad bit clueless. Who else to look for? Ewan McGregor plays Barbara's husband, the longtime couple struggling through some serious issues, Abigail Breslin their rebellious teenage daughter, and Dermot Mulroney as Karen's new boyfriend and recent fiance who you just know is up to something in the slimy department and Misty Upham as Johnna, the Native American (or Injun, whatever you like) caretaker Beverly hires for Violet before his disappearance.
Some complaints were that for a dark comedy, there wasn't enough...well, comedy. There are laughs, but there is far more in the old drama department. The dinner scene is the heart of the movie, some genuine, out-loud laughs that quickly transition into painful, real moments that you could see happening at any long, overdue family reunion. The movie goes down some surprising routes in the second half and let's face it, a happy ending here just wasn't going to happen. This is a drama about the story, about the drama, about the acting. Highly recommended. If you're a fan of family/friend dramas from Home for the Holidays to The Family Stone, The Big Chill to Rain Man, you'll enjoy this one, hopefully a whole lot.
August: Osage County (2013): *** 1/2 /****
The Sons of Katie Elder
"First, we reunite, then find Ma and Pa's killer...then read some reviews."
Showing posts with label Abigail Breslin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Abigail Breslin. Show all posts
Wednesday, August 13, 2014
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Ender's Game
Originally published in 1985 from author Orson Scott Card, the novel Ender's Game has become a fan and cult favorite for readers over the last 25-plus years. For years, it never got that big screen adaptation, that big-budget science fiction flick that would appease diehard fans and newbies alike. Well, we got it, and maybe with the advances in technology, it was worth the wait. Hitting theaters a few weeks ago and struggling a bit at the box office as I write this review, 2013's Ender's Game.
Fifty years into the future, Earth has moved on from an alien invasion by a race known as the Formics. The war and invasion was costly, millions of people killed in the blink of an eye and the subsequent attacks. Five decades later, the International Fleet continues to prepare for a counterattack, turning to children and teenagers to lead the defense. Among the trainers are Colonel Graff (Harrison Ford) and his right hand officer, Major Anderson (Viola Davis), always trying to find the child best suited to lead the defense of mankind. Among the thousands of trainees, Graff thinks he's found the right subject, the perfect individual to lead the defense, a young boy named Ender Wiggins (Asa Butterfield), the youngest of three children who is brilliant in his analysis and clear-thinking in almost all his actions. He displays all the characteristics they're looking for, but is he really the best choice? Is he almost too smart? Can young Ender keep his own demons under wraps to live up to his potential?
I never read Card's novel the movie is based on. Deal with it. Okay, that's a little harsh. Just want to get that out there. I'm not a fan, haven't read it, and went into this movie without any expectations of what this movie had to live up to it. From director/screenwriter Gavin Hood (X-Men Origins: Wolverine), 'Game' is a pretty entertaining, polished, well-told science fiction story that I loved for half of its 114-minute running time. It has a ton of potential, plenty to the point I'm still looking forward to checking out Card's original novel. 'Game' asks a lot of questions, some pretty dark considering this is a movie at least somewhat aimed at a teenage audience. On a familiar level, there's growing up and discovering who you are as a person, but there's much more. It's living and dealing with your flaws, embracing on them or working at them, becoming part of a group or becoming a leader and on a far bigger level, the loss of a few for the savior of many. It's pretty heady stuff.
Visually, 'Game' is what a science fiction film can be when computer-generated images are used to aid a story rather than overwhelm it. The CGI blends seamlessly at all times here, a future down the road some but not so far removed from the 2013 world we know now. When Ender is sent to Battle School, we're introduced to a West Point-like culture in Space Station form floating through space far above Earth. The school and its tech-heavy hallways and corridors looks familiar, like something we've seen in countless other sci-fi movies, but with a new spin. The coolest thing is the Battle Room, an expansive, enclosed zero gravity circle where the Armies of the Battle School learn strategy and battle theory, all while floating through space while still doing battle. As we see more, I thought it's cool to see that Ender and his fellow trainees use touch screen-like technology to lead armies of spaceships, drones, fighters and thousands of people. It ain't too far removed from iPads, iPhones and any number of other modern tech items. Yeah, it could have a cool charm if it had been made in the 1980s, but how about 2013? It's a pretty ideal time for a story like this with that sort of technology.
A very talented young actor, Butterfield is excellent as young, talented, even troubled Ender Wiggins. The movie depends on him so that he steps up to the plate is a huge positive. The fact that the character has touches of the Christ figure -- the One to save us all, the Savior -- is subtle without beating us over the head with the message too. The young actors are solid across the board, especially Hailee Steinfeld (True Grit) as Petra, a fellow Battle School student who befriends Ender, and Abigail Breslin making the most of a stereotypical part as Ender's worrying sister, Valentine. As for the rest of the students, look for Aramis Knight, Suraj Partha, Moises Arias as a violent rival for Ender, and a handful of other parts that all handle themselves really well. It's encouraging to see this many young actors perform so well, and all in one movie.
The focus is on the child parts, but the adult actors don't disappoint either. Harrison Ford has a good part, playing against type a bit, as Colonel Graff, the commanding officer who's intentions are not perfectly clear. How far is he willing to go to accomplish his goals? What is he willing to sacrifice? Viola Davis provides the perfect counter, a voice of reason and clear-thinking, to Ford's Graff. Ben Kingsley is poorly used as Mazer Rackham, a legendary pilot who provides quite the example for the young students. Nonso Anozie has a fun part as Sergeant Dap, the drill sergeant hovering over the students with an iron fist.
So what's the problem? It's hard to peg. I think there's just too much going on for its own good with a movie that runs just under two hours. The training sequences become repetitive quickly, and then all the sudden we're at the finale! There's the ending and then a quasi-twist that continues the movie for another 10 minutes that limp to the finish. It's not a bad movie by any means. There's a lot of positives, A LOT of them, but I came away mildly disappointed because the start was so strong. I still feel very comfortable recommending it, but I could have recommended it more if that makes any sense.
Ender's Game (2013): ** 1/2 /****
Fifty years into the future, Earth has moved on from an alien invasion by a race known as the Formics. The war and invasion was costly, millions of people killed in the blink of an eye and the subsequent attacks. Five decades later, the International Fleet continues to prepare for a counterattack, turning to children and teenagers to lead the defense. Among the trainers are Colonel Graff (Harrison Ford) and his right hand officer, Major Anderson (Viola Davis), always trying to find the child best suited to lead the defense of mankind. Among the thousands of trainees, Graff thinks he's found the right subject, the perfect individual to lead the defense, a young boy named Ender Wiggins (Asa Butterfield), the youngest of three children who is brilliant in his analysis and clear-thinking in almost all his actions. He displays all the characteristics they're looking for, but is he really the best choice? Is he almost too smart? Can young Ender keep his own demons under wraps to live up to his potential?
I never read Card's novel the movie is based on. Deal with it. Okay, that's a little harsh. Just want to get that out there. I'm not a fan, haven't read it, and went into this movie without any expectations of what this movie had to live up to it. From director/screenwriter Gavin Hood (X-Men Origins: Wolverine), 'Game' is a pretty entertaining, polished, well-told science fiction story that I loved for half of its 114-minute running time. It has a ton of potential, plenty to the point I'm still looking forward to checking out Card's original novel. 'Game' asks a lot of questions, some pretty dark considering this is a movie at least somewhat aimed at a teenage audience. On a familiar level, there's growing up and discovering who you are as a person, but there's much more. It's living and dealing with your flaws, embracing on them or working at them, becoming part of a group or becoming a leader and on a far bigger level, the loss of a few for the savior of many. It's pretty heady stuff.
Visually, 'Game' is what a science fiction film can be when computer-generated images are used to aid a story rather than overwhelm it. The CGI blends seamlessly at all times here, a future down the road some but not so far removed from the 2013 world we know now. When Ender is sent to Battle School, we're introduced to a West Point-like culture in Space Station form floating through space far above Earth. The school and its tech-heavy hallways and corridors looks familiar, like something we've seen in countless other sci-fi movies, but with a new spin. The coolest thing is the Battle Room, an expansive, enclosed zero gravity circle where the Armies of the Battle School learn strategy and battle theory, all while floating through space while still doing battle. As we see more, I thought it's cool to see that Ender and his fellow trainees use touch screen-like technology to lead armies of spaceships, drones, fighters and thousands of people. It ain't too far removed from iPads, iPhones and any number of other modern tech items. Yeah, it could have a cool charm if it had been made in the 1980s, but how about 2013? It's a pretty ideal time for a story like this with that sort of technology.
A very talented young actor, Butterfield is excellent as young, talented, even troubled Ender Wiggins. The movie depends on him so that he steps up to the plate is a huge positive. The fact that the character has touches of the Christ figure -- the One to save us all, the Savior -- is subtle without beating us over the head with the message too. The young actors are solid across the board, especially Hailee Steinfeld (True Grit) as Petra, a fellow Battle School student who befriends Ender, and Abigail Breslin making the most of a stereotypical part as Ender's worrying sister, Valentine. As for the rest of the students, look for Aramis Knight, Suraj Partha, Moises Arias as a violent rival for Ender, and a handful of other parts that all handle themselves really well. It's encouraging to see this many young actors perform so well, and all in one movie.
The focus is on the child parts, but the adult actors don't disappoint either. Harrison Ford has a good part, playing against type a bit, as Colonel Graff, the commanding officer who's intentions are not perfectly clear. How far is he willing to go to accomplish his goals? What is he willing to sacrifice? Viola Davis provides the perfect counter, a voice of reason and clear-thinking, to Ford's Graff. Ben Kingsley is poorly used as Mazer Rackham, a legendary pilot who provides quite the example for the young students. Nonso Anozie has a fun part as Sergeant Dap, the drill sergeant hovering over the students with an iron fist.
So what's the problem? It's hard to peg. I think there's just too much going on for its own good with a movie that runs just under two hours. The training sequences become repetitive quickly, and then all the sudden we're at the finale! There's the ending and then a quasi-twist that continues the movie for another 10 minutes that limp to the finish. It's not a bad movie by any means. There's a lot of positives, A LOT of them, but I came away mildly disappointed because the start was so strong. I still feel very comfortable recommending it, but I could have recommended it more if that makes any sense.
Ender's Game (2013): ** 1/2 /****
Labels:
2010s,
Abigail Breslin,
Ben Kingsley,
Hailee Steinfeld,
Harrison Ford,
Sci-Fi,
Viola Davis
Thursday, September 16, 2010
Signs
Bursting onto the movie scene like few other directors have, M. Night Shyamalan had a huge, surprise hit with his first movie, 1999's The Sixth Sense. It was a movie that caught people off guard with its quality and especially the huge, twist ending that on repeated viewings seems painfully obvious, but that first viewing? About as complete a shock as a movie can produce. But since Sixth Sense, Shyamalan's movies have gone progressively downhill for the most part. The one exception seems to be 2002's Signs.
It's easier judging movies at the time they were made and not 8 years later because a lot can change in that time. But with Signs, it's hard not to see how the mighty have fallen. Shyamalan's four movies since have ranged from below average to panned and stars Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix have both hit some road blocks in their career, more on a personal level with personal choices than actual career choices. But at the time they were all near or at the top of their games in terms of fan following and a general popularity. Since? Maybe not so much, but it's hard not to watch this movie and think about the departures from success this trio has gone through.
Living on his family farm some 45 miles outside Philadelphia, former reverend Graham Hess (Gibson) wakes up one morning to find huge crop circles in his cornfields. What could they mean? Are they elaborate pranks, hoaxes performed by teenagers, or just maybe, could they be something else, something other worldly? With his brother Merrill (Phoenix) and his two kids, Morgan (Rory Culkin) and Bo (Abigail Breslin), Graham begins to question what's happening, and he's not the only one. Similar crop circles start popping up in countries all over the world while strange, unexplained lights float over these cities. As the world questions what is going on, Graham remains focused on getting his family through whatever is about to happen.
From the moment the opening credits started and composer James Newton Howard's score kicked in, all I could think was how much the movie's style reminded me of an Alfred Hitchcock thriller. Playing on some Hitchcockian tendencies, Shyamalan makes an often unsettling thriller that for the most part keeps you guessing. He creates a very thick tension, a sense of the coming doom that is about to hit this little farm. The story is almost entirely contained at the Hess farm with a few quick detours and a character here and there making an appearance. But above all else, this is a story about the Hess family and their struggles and solutions for this unexplained phenomena taking place all over the world.
Through his handful of movies, Shyamalan has become typecast as the "ending twist director." You go into his movies now thinking 'I wonder how he's going to trick us here' thanks to the con job he pulled in Sixth Sense. Well, here's the twist...sort of. There isn't a major, shocking slap you in the face surprise. If anything the ending is a little weak in its execution. Like a lot of thrillers that start off so strongly, Signs struggles to maintain that pace throughout. It's like Christmas Eve. You see the presents and wonder what's in them. The wait and wonder can be half the fun. The revelation here -- while creepy and well-handled -- falls short in a lot of ways, especially in its resolution. This isn't a movie-derailing flaw, just one that prevented it from being a near-classic. The ending is good, but not great.
In the news more for his anti-Semitic rants lately, Gibson shows here that as always, he was a very capable actor capable of pulling off incredibly dramatic roles. His Graham Hess is a tortured soul, one struggling with an incident from the past that claimed his wife's life. He tries to trudge on, to start life over again in a sense, raising his kids as best he can. Graham struggles with the faith that carried him through even the roughest patches in the past and doesn't quite know how to handle this dilemma. Phoenix has said he's retiring from acting -- a shame because of his epic talent -- and this is another quirky role for him. I can't put my finger on Merrill, a middle-aged man who never quite lived up to his potential and knows it but is nonetheless a good man who moves in with his brother to help raise the children. A very solid supporting performance. Culkin and Breslin also impress on the child actor scale, never grating or annoying, just good actors.
The movie has its fair share of creepy moments with the sense of the unknown hovering over the world. Shyamalan's shooting style emphasizes all this with camera work that is never invasive or over the top. His camera isn't moving all around. Scenes are long, unedited takes that put you on edge because you keep waiting for something huge, something shocking to come flying at the camera. The fact that the huge surprise never comes? A complaint, but not a major one. The build-up and tension is strong enough to carry the movie past some of its struggles in the last third.
Signs <---trailer (2002): ***/****
It's easier judging movies at the time they were made and not 8 years later because a lot can change in that time. But with Signs, it's hard not to see how the mighty have fallen. Shyamalan's four movies since have ranged from below average to panned and stars Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix have both hit some road blocks in their career, more on a personal level with personal choices than actual career choices. But at the time they were all near or at the top of their games in terms of fan following and a general popularity. Since? Maybe not so much, but it's hard not to watch this movie and think about the departures from success this trio has gone through.
Living on his family farm some 45 miles outside Philadelphia, former reverend Graham Hess (Gibson) wakes up one morning to find huge crop circles in his cornfields. What could they mean? Are they elaborate pranks, hoaxes performed by teenagers, or just maybe, could they be something else, something other worldly? With his brother Merrill (Phoenix) and his two kids, Morgan (Rory Culkin) and Bo (Abigail Breslin), Graham begins to question what's happening, and he's not the only one. Similar crop circles start popping up in countries all over the world while strange, unexplained lights float over these cities. As the world questions what is going on, Graham remains focused on getting his family through whatever is about to happen.
From the moment the opening credits started and composer James Newton Howard's score kicked in, all I could think was how much the movie's style reminded me of an Alfred Hitchcock thriller. Playing on some Hitchcockian tendencies, Shyamalan makes an often unsettling thriller that for the most part keeps you guessing. He creates a very thick tension, a sense of the coming doom that is about to hit this little farm. The story is almost entirely contained at the Hess farm with a few quick detours and a character here and there making an appearance. But above all else, this is a story about the Hess family and their struggles and solutions for this unexplained phenomena taking place all over the world.
Through his handful of movies, Shyamalan has become typecast as the "ending twist director." You go into his movies now thinking 'I wonder how he's going to trick us here' thanks to the con job he pulled in Sixth Sense. Well, here's the twist...sort of. There isn't a major, shocking slap you in the face surprise. If anything the ending is a little weak in its execution. Like a lot of thrillers that start off so strongly, Signs struggles to maintain that pace throughout. It's like Christmas Eve. You see the presents and wonder what's in them. The wait and wonder can be half the fun. The revelation here -- while creepy and well-handled -- falls short in a lot of ways, especially in its resolution. This isn't a movie-derailing flaw, just one that prevented it from being a near-classic. The ending is good, but not great.
In the news more for his anti-Semitic rants lately, Gibson shows here that as always, he was a very capable actor capable of pulling off incredibly dramatic roles. His Graham Hess is a tortured soul, one struggling with an incident from the past that claimed his wife's life. He tries to trudge on, to start life over again in a sense, raising his kids as best he can. Graham struggles with the faith that carried him through even the roughest patches in the past and doesn't quite know how to handle this dilemma. Phoenix has said he's retiring from acting -- a shame because of his epic talent -- and this is another quirky role for him. I can't put my finger on Merrill, a middle-aged man who never quite lived up to his potential and knows it but is nonetheless a good man who moves in with his brother to help raise the children. A very solid supporting performance. Culkin and Breslin also impress on the child actor scale, never grating or annoying, just good actors.
The movie has its fair share of creepy moments with the sense of the unknown hovering over the world. Shyamalan's shooting style emphasizes all this with camera work that is never invasive or over the top. His camera isn't moving all around. Scenes are long, unedited takes that put you on edge because you keep waiting for something huge, something shocking to come flying at the camera. The fact that the huge surprise never comes? A complaint, but not a major one. The build-up and tension is strong enough to carry the movie past some of its struggles in the last third.
Signs <---trailer (2002): ***/****
Labels:
2000s,
Abigail Breslin,
Joaquin Phoenix,
M Night Shyamalan,
Mel Gibson,
Sci-Fi
Tuesday, March 16, 2010
Zombieland
Horror movies, even the serial killer thrillers, have never been my thing. The same thing applies to torture porn. But zombie movies? Count me in. I've yet to see one I can't recommend at least something about them. And the best thing to happen to zombies is easily someone deciding they could run and run fast. All those old George Romero zombie movies, they were walking around, stumbling slowly as people got to safety. But a sprinting zombie? That qualifies as scary.
In the same vein of Shaun of the Dead, 2009's Zombieland has some fun with the zombie movie. First-time director Ruben Fleischer puts his own spin on the genre with a comedy that is surprisingly smart while leaving most of the slapstick out. Of course, there are countless zombies to be shot, stabbed, beaten and run over so it's not exactly high class humor. It's the type of small-scale comedy that is almost completely self-contained where characters aren't addressed by names, but by the location they're trying to get to in a zombie-ridden U.S.
It's been several months since a man ate a contaminated hamburger that started a huge chain reaction of people turning into zombies. Very few humans are left, but one of them, a college student, Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg), is trying to make it back to his home in Ohio to see his parents who he's not even sure are still alive. Columbus has developed a detailed list of rules that have helped him survive on his own, but nothing can really prepare him for when he meets Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson) on the road. His new road-trip buddy is a bit of an eccentric. They meet two sisters, Wichita (Emma Stone of Superbad) and Little Rock (Abigail Breslin of Little Miss Sunshine), and join them as they try to get to Pacific Playland, an amusement park supposedly free of the zombies.
When it comes to humor, I'm not saying this is straight laced or subtle, but most of the time it doesn't go for easy laughs...well, other than all the zombie killing. It's more of a road movie with this eclectic group of people traveling across a post-apocalyptic America. Ha, bet you didn't think you'd get something like that dropped on your head reading a Zombieland review, did you? As Fleischer brings up on the DVD, it's only a couple months since the virus started so there aren't a ton of zombies yet. Most of them are saved for the finale, but more on that later. It's a funny movie in a way that I didn't think it would be. Part of the laughs do come from the ridiculousness of the situation -- it'd be hard not to laugh -- but it can be a surprisingly sweet comedy at times too.
Sometimes, a movie just gets the casting right. With just four main characters, Zombieland goes 4-for-4 at the casting plate. Eisenberg does what he does best, awkward, subtle humor, but he does get a chance to do some physical humor and pulls it off well. His narration is hilarious, including his ever-growing list of "How to Survive the Zombies" list that advises you on what to do and what not to do. Watch the movie's opening with Columbus' rules HERE. Emma Stone is femme fatale Wichita, a really smart, really hot girl trying to protect herself and her sister. Columbus of course falls hard for her because let's face it, there aren't too many girls left. Breslin continues to expand her horizons and is really funny as a 12-year old forced to grow up pretty quickly.
This ensemble works together about as well as can be expected, but the glue here is Harrelson's Tallahassee, a gun-toting, Nascar-loving, smart ass redneck who loves nothing more than killing zombies and a good Twinkie (it's never explained and it's funnier because of it). He has an emotional scene describing why he loves killing zombies that could have been out of place in this story, but it works. Tallahassee is the great breakout character here, providing the movie's funniest lines. And really, it's great to see Harrelson in these mainstream movies again. One more cast member who should be nominated for best cameo ever is Bill Murray playing Bill Murray. He's onscreen for about 4 minutes and steals each one of those minutes.
This one definitely surprised me in how much I liked it. I figured I'd enjoy it, but not this much. Really funny, very quotable, and lots of gratuitous zombie killing, especially in the end as an army of zombies descend on the fab four. The four main cast members all have different styles, but those styles click together. The best news to come out of this 2009 sleeper hit is that a sequel is in the works. I can't wait to see where they go with these characters and story.
Zombieland <----(2009): ***/****
In the same vein of Shaun of the Dead, 2009's Zombieland has some fun with the zombie movie. First-time director Ruben Fleischer puts his own spin on the genre with a comedy that is surprisingly smart while leaving most of the slapstick out. Of course, there are countless zombies to be shot, stabbed, beaten and run over so it's not exactly high class humor. It's the type of small-scale comedy that is almost completely self-contained where characters aren't addressed by names, but by the location they're trying to get to in a zombie-ridden U.S.
It's been several months since a man ate a contaminated hamburger that started a huge chain reaction of people turning into zombies. Very few humans are left, but one of them, a college student, Columbus (Jesse Eisenberg), is trying to make it back to his home in Ohio to see his parents who he's not even sure are still alive. Columbus has developed a detailed list of rules that have helped him survive on his own, but nothing can really prepare him for when he meets Tallahassee (Woody Harrelson) on the road. His new road-trip buddy is a bit of an eccentric. They meet two sisters, Wichita (Emma Stone of Superbad) and Little Rock (Abigail Breslin of Little Miss Sunshine), and join them as they try to get to Pacific Playland, an amusement park supposedly free of the zombies.
When it comes to humor, I'm not saying this is straight laced or subtle, but most of the time it doesn't go for easy laughs...well, other than all the zombie killing. It's more of a road movie with this eclectic group of people traveling across a post-apocalyptic America. Ha, bet you didn't think you'd get something like that dropped on your head reading a Zombieland review, did you? As Fleischer brings up on the DVD, it's only a couple months since the virus started so there aren't a ton of zombies yet. Most of them are saved for the finale, but more on that later. It's a funny movie in a way that I didn't think it would be. Part of the laughs do come from the ridiculousness of the situation -- it'd be hard not to laugh -- but it can be a surprisingly sweet comedy at times too.
Sometimes, a movie just gets the casting right. With just four main characters, Zombieland goes 4-for-4 at the casting plate. Eisenberg does what he does best, awkward, subtle humor, but he does get a chance to do some physical humor and pulls it off well. His narration is hilarious, including his ever-growing list of "How to Survive the Zombies" list that advises you on what to do and what not to do. Watch the movie's opening with Columbus' rules HERE. Emma Stone is femme fatale Wichita, a really smart, really hot girl trying to protect herself and her sister. Columbus of course falls hard for her because let's face it, there aren't too many girls left. Breslin continues to expand her horizons and is really funny as a 12-year old forced to grow up pretty quickly.
This ensemble works together about as well as can be expected, but the glue here is Harrelson's Tallahassee, a gun-toting, Nascar-loving, smart ass redneck who loves nothing more than killing zombies and a good Twinkie (it's never explained and it's funnier because of it). He has an emotional scene describing why he loves killing zombies that could have been out of place in this story, but it works. Tallahassee is the great breakout character here, providing the movie's funniest lines. And really, it's great to see Harrelson in these mainstream movies again. One more cast member who should be nominated for best cameo ever is Bill Murray playing Bill Murray. He's onscreen for about 4 minutes and steals each one of those minutes.
This one definitely surprised me in how much I liked it. I figured I'd enjoy it, but not this much. Really funny, very quotable, and lots of gratuitous zombie killing, especially in the end as an army of zombies descend on the fab four. The four main cast members all have different styles, but those styles click together. The best news to come out of this 2009 sleeper hit is that a sequel is in the works. I can't wait to see where they go with these characters and story.
Zombieland <----(2009): ***/****
Labels:
2000s,
Abigail Breslin,
Bill Murray,
Comedy,
Emma Stone,
Jesse Eisenberg,
Woody Harrelson
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




